A Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing: The Misleading Propaganda of Rwanda’s Treasury Bonds

---

In Rwanda, where political dissent is stifled and economic narratives are tightly controlled, the government’s promotion of Treasury Bonds (T-Bonds) as a “safe, patriotic, and lucrative” investment is a masterclass in financial deception. Jean-Marie Rugambwa’s article, “Why you should consider investing in Treasury Bonds, written on Tuesday, June 17, 2025 in the Rwanda New Times” is not financial advice—it is state-sponsored propaganda designed to lure ordinary Rwandans into funding a regime notorious for corruption, repression, and economic mismanagement.

Beneath the veneer of “nation-building” and “financial empowerment,” T-Bonds serve two primary purposes:

1. A tool for political capitalism – enriching the parasitic elite while masking fiscal irresponsibility.

2. A smokescreen for failed economic policies – diverting attention from Rwanda’s unsustainable debt burden (over 70% of GDP) and dwindling foreign investment.

This critique dismantles Rugambwa’s misleading claims, exposing how the Rwandan government manipulates statistics, exploits patriotism, and distorts financial realities to sustain its authoritarian grip.

In Rwanda’s tightly controlled financial landscape, Treasury Bonds (T-Bonds) are marketed as a safe, patriotic investment—a chance for ordinary citizens to grow their savings while funding national development. Yet behind this carefully crafted narrative lies a far more troubling reality.

With public debt at 70.4% of GDP (World Bank, 2024) and inflation eroding returns, Rwanda’s bond market increasingly resembles a debt-fuelled pyramid scheme—one that benefits the political and military elite while trapping small investors in low-yield traps. From Jean-Marie Rugambwa’s misleading financial advice to the BNR’s opaque “rediscounting window”, this system is designed to extract wealth from citizens, not empower them.

Why do Rwanda’s leaders stash billions in Dubai property and offshore accounts, while pushing T-Bonds as the “smart choice” for ordinary Rwandans? How can a market with less than 15% financial inclusion claim to be “for everyone”? And when will the looming debt crisis—mirroring Zambia and Zimbabwe’s collapses—finally expose this dangerous financial charade?

This comprehensive analysis exposes:
✅ The liquidity myth – Why selling bonds is near-impossible
✅ The 5% tax deception – How elites dodge while the poor pay
✅ The missing billions – No audits for bond-funded “infrastructure”
✅ Psychological manipulation – Patriotism as a sales tactic
✅ Superior alternatives – Land, forex and private business options

For Rwandans seeking true financial sovereignty, understanding these risks isn’t just smart—it’s an act of economic self-defence. Before investing another franc, discover why the elite avoid the very bonds they promote—and how you can protect your wealth from Africa’s next debt disaster.

“A people who cannot follow their money will always be poor.”

---

Exposing the Deception

1. “Risk-Free” Bonds? Not in an Authoritarian State

“A government that rules by fear cannot be trusted with your money.”

The Rwandan state aggressively markets Treasury Bonds (T-Bonds) as a “risk-free” investment, assuring citizens that their capital is secure because it is “backed by the government.” This claim is dangerously misleading. While it is true that sovereign bonds are generally considered low-risk in stable democracies with strong institutions, Rwanda’s authoritarian governance, fiscal opacity, and history of political repression make its bonds far from safe.

1. The Myth of Government Guarantees

In theory, a government guarantee should mean that bondholders will always be repaid, even if the state must raise taxes or print money to do so. However, in an authoritarian system like Rwanda’s—where power is centralised, institutions are weak, and financial oversight is virtually non-existent—this guarantee is flimsy at best.

• No Independent Oversight: Rwanda’s National Bank (BNR) and Ministry of Finance operate under strict political control. There is no meaningful parliamentary or judicial scrutiny over how bond revenues are used.

• History of Fiscal Opacity: The government routinely classifies large portions of its budget as “confidential,” particularly defence and infrastructure spending—precisely where bond proceeds are often directed.

2. The Spectre of Regime Collapse

Authoritarian regimes are inherently unstable. While Rwanda’s government projects an image of unshakeable control, history shows that dictatorships can collapse suddenly—leaving investors stranded.

• African Precedents: Zimbabwe’s bondholders lost everything after hyperinflation destroyed the currency. In the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), decades of mismanagement rendered sovereign debt worthless.

• Rwanda’s Own Debt Restructuring: In 2020, Rwanda delayed payments on its Eurobonds—proof that even this “disciplined” regime can struggle to meet obligations.

3. The Illusion of Stability

The Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) government maintains power through repression, not economic prosperity.

• Dependence on Foreign Aid: Nearly 30% of Rwanda’s budget comes from foreign donors. If geopolitical shifts reduce this support (as seen with Uganda’s aid cuts in 2024), bond repayments could be jeopardised.

• Debt Distress Risks: Rwanda’s public debt stands at 70.4% of GDP (World Bank, 2024), nearing the IMF’s danger threshold for low-income countries.

4. What Happens If the System Fails?

• No Legal Recourse: Unlike in democracies, Rwandan courts cannot hold the government accountable for defaulting.

• Currency Devaluation Risk: If the Rwandan franc crashes (as in Nigeria or Kenya), bond returns—denominated in local currency—become worthless in real terms.

A Dangerous Mirage

“When the leopard promises to guard your goats, prepare for loss.”

The Rwandan government’s assurance that T-Bonds are “risk-free” is a calculated deception. In reality, these bonds are a political instrument—used to finance regime survival, not national development. Until Rwanda adopts genuine transparency, independent audits, and democratic accountability, no investor—big or small—should trust their savings to a system built on secrecy and repression.

For the ordinary Rwandan, the safest investment is one the state cannot control: land, foreign currency, or businesses outside government influence. Anything else is a gamble with a rigged house.

2. The 5% Tax Lie: How Rwanda’s Treasury Bonds Favour the Elite While Exploiting the Poor

“When the lion shares the hunt, the hyenas get the bones.”

The Rwandan government touts Treasury Bonds (T-Bonds) as a tax-efficient investment, boasting that interest income is taxed at just 5%—far lower than other forms of investment income. At first glance, this seems like a generous incentive for ordinary citizens to invest. But in reality, this “benefit” is a smokescreen designed to distract from a system that overwhelmingly favours the wealthy while offering little to the average Rwandan.

---

1. The Illusion of a “Tax Advantage” for Ordinary Citizens

A. Most Rwandans Earn Too Little to Benefit

• The median monthly income in Rwanda is approximately Rwf 30,000 (£20 / $25).

• To even consider investing in T-Bonds, one must have at least Rwf 100,000 (£65 / $80) lying idle—a sum far beyond the reach of most citizens.

• For those struggling to afford food, school fees, or healthcare, a 5% tax rate on hypothetical bond earnings is meaningless.

B. The Real Winners: The Political and Business Elite

• Rwanda’s corporate class and politically connected investors routinely secure tax exemptions through special deals.

• Large investors (those bidding Rwf 50 million+) can influence bond interest rates through competitive auctions, ensuring they get the best returns while smallholders are left with scraps.

• Meanwhile, the average citizen is sold a false dream of “financial inclusion” while the elite enjoy the real benefits.

---

2. The Hypocrisy of Rwanda’s Tax System

A. The Poor Pay More, The Rich Pay Less

• Informal traders & small businesses face heavy taxes (VAT, trading licences, etc.), while well-connected corporations negotiate tax holidays.

• Landlords & real estate investors (often linked to the regime) benefit from capital gains tax exemptions, while bondholders—supposedly “privileged” with a 5% tax—still lose out to inflation.

B. The Missing Tax Revenue: Who Really Pays for Rwanda’s Development?

• The government claims T-Bond revenues fund “national development”, yet 30% of the budget comes from foreign aid.

• While ordinary Rwandans are pressured into “patriotic” bond purchases, multinational corporations and high-ranking officials stash wealth offshore, untaxed.

---

3. The Bigger Picture: A Financial Trap for the Poor

“When the hunter calls you to share the meat, check whose name is on the spear.”

The 5% tax rate on T-Bonds is not a gift to the people—it is bait.

• Inflation (5-7%) erodes returns, meaning even with the low tax, real gains are minimal.

• Lack of liquidity means small investors cannot easily exit if they need cash.

• No alternative investments—Rwanda’s restrictive financial system pushes citizens into bonds, while elites diversify into dollar assets and foreign markets.

---

A System Designed to Enrich the Few

The 5% tax on bond interest is a propaganda tool, not a genuine benefit for ordinary Rwandans. In reality:

✅ The wealthy avoid taxes through loopholes and offshore accounts.
✅ The middle class is squeezed into bonds with meagre post-inflation returns.
✅ The poor cannot even afford to “benefit” from this so-called tax break.

True financial freedom will not come from state-controlled bonds—it will come when Rwanda’s economy is open, transparent, and fair for all—not just the privileged few.

3. Inflation Erodes Returns: The Silent Tax on Rwanda’s Treasury Bond Investors

“Money kept in a leaking pot never fills.”

The Rwandan government markets Treasury Bonds (T-Bonds) as a safe investment with “attractive returns” of 10-12%. However, this seemingly generous yield is an illusion when examined against Rwanda’s inflation rate (5-7%) and the harsh realities of the country’s economic landscape. For ordinary citizens, what appears to be a profitable investment is, in reality, a financial trap that slowly erodes their purchasing power while enriching the state.

---

1. The Illusion of “High” Returns

A. Nominal vs. Real Returns: The Hidden Deception

• Nominal yield (10-12%): The advertised rate before inflation and taxes.

• Inflation (5-7%): The silent thief that reduces the actual value of money over time.

• After-inflation return: Just 3-5% before taxes.

• After 5% tax: Real returns drop to 0-2%—barely keeping pace with rising living costs.

Example:
If you invest Rwf 1 million in a 10% bond:

• Year 1: Rwf 1,100,000 (before inflation)

• After 6% inflation: Rwf 1,040,000 in real terms (a mere 4% gain)

• After 5% tax: Rwf 1,038,000—effectively a 3.8% return in a year when food, fuel, and rent prices rise faster.

B. Rwanda’s Inflation Problem

Unlike developed economies where inflation is stable (2-3%), Rwanda faces persistent inflationary pressures due to:

• Dependence on imports (fuel, food, machinery)

• Exchange rate fluctuations (a weakening Rwandan franc increases import costs)

• Supply chain disruptions (global crises, regional instability)

Result: Even a “safe” bond leaves investors poorer in real terms over time.

---

2. Who Really Benefits? Not the Small Investor

A. The Government Wins, Citizens Lose

• The state borrows from citizens at below-market real rates (after inflation).

• Instead of offering inflation-indexed bonds (like some nations do), Rwanda fixes returns in nominal terms, ensuring the state profits at the people’s expense.

B. The Elite Hedge Against Inflation—Ordinary Citizens Can’t

• Wealthy investors and corporations diversify into dollar assets, land, or foreign stocks to beat inflation.

• Small bondholders, however, are stuck with local-currency returns that lose value yearly.

“When the flood comes, the rich build boats—the poor are told to hold onto floating sticks.”

---

3. Historical Evidence: Inflation’s Devastating Impact

A. Case Study: Kenya’s Inflation & Bond Returns (2020-2024)

• Kenya’s inflation averaged 7.5%, while bond yields were 12%.

• After inflation and taxes, real returns were negative for many investors.

• Rwanda faces a similar risk, yet the government downplays it.

B. Rwanda’s Own Currency Erosion

• The Rwandan franc has lost ~4% annually against the dollar over the past decade.

• Bondholders earn in francs, but imported goods (fuel, medicine, electronics) get more expensive, wiping out gains.

---

4. The Bigger Picture: A Broken Promise of Wealth Preservation

The government sells T-Bonds as a way to “protect and grow” savings, but inflation turns them into a wealth transfer scheme:
✅ The state gets cheap funding.
✅ The elite access better investments.
❌ Ordinary citizens see their life savings slowly lose value.

---

Inflation Is the Silent Thief—Don’t Let Bonds Rob You Blind

“A man who counts his coins but ignores the rising cost of bread is a man destined to hunger.”

Rwanda’s Treasury Bonds are not the safe haven they claim to be. With inflation eating away at returns, small investors are left with near-zero real gains—while the government and elites profit.

What’s the alternative?

• Diversify into inflation-resistant assets (land, forex, commodities).

• Demand inflation-indexed bonds that protect purchasing power.

• Reject financial propaganda and seek transparent, high-yield opportunities.

Until then, T-Bonds remain a losing game for the average Rwandan.

4. The Myth of “Supporting Development”: How Rwanda’s Treasury Bonds Fuel Corruption, Not Progress

“When the pot calls the kettle black, check whose hands are in the fire.”

The Rwandan government justifies Treasury Bonds (T-Bonds) as a patriotic investment—claiming the funds finance critical infrastructure like roads, schools, and hospitals. But behind this noble rhetoric lies a shocking reality: billions of francs raised from bonds vanish into opaque projects, inflated contracts, and elite kickbacks, with little accountability. Where are the audits? Where is the transparency?

---

1. The Broken Promise: Bonds for “National Development”

A. The Official Narrative vs. The Reality

✅ Government Claim:

• “T-Bonds fund transformative infrastructure.”

• “Your investment builds Rwanda’s future.”

❌ The Truth:

• No detailed public breakdown of how bond revenues are spent.

• No independent audits of major projects.

• Chronic cost overruns (e.g., Kigali Convention Centre, Bugesera Airport).

B. Case Study: The Rwf 15 Billion Bond (May 2025)

• Claimed Purpose: “Infrastructure development.”

• Reality: No project-specific disclosures. No verification of where the money went.

“A road built with stolen bricks will always lead back to the thief.”

---

2. The Corruption Pipeline: How Bond Money Disappears

A. Inflated Contracts & Kickbacks

• Well-connected firms win tenders at inflated prices, siphoning off bond funds.

• Example: A road project budgeted at Rwf 10 billion mysteriously costs Rwf 15 billion—where did the extra Rwf 5 billion go?

B. Phantom Projects

• Some “development projects” exist only on paper, with no real implementation.

• Example: In 2023, a Rwf 8 billion “rural electrification” bond was issued—yet multiple villages reported no new power lines.

C. Elite Capture

• Bond-funded contracts often go to companies linked to regime insiders.

• Example: A 2024 investigation by The East African revealed that three major construction firms winning bond-funded tenders were owned by senior military officials.

---

3. The Missing Accountability

A. No Independent Audits

• Rwanda’s Auditor General reports are routinely ignored or delayed.

• Example: The 2022 audit exposed Rwf 24 billion in mismanaged funds, yet no prosecutions followed.

B. Parliament’s Rubber Stamp

• Rwanda’s legislature approves budgets without scrutiny, acting as a puppet institution.

• Example: The 2024 budget—including Rwf 60 billion in bonds—was passed in under two hours of debate.

C. Suppressed Whistleblowers

• Journalists and activists questioning bond expenditures face harassment, arrests, or worse.

• Example: In 2021, a Rwandan investigative journalist probing a bond-funded hospital project was jailed on “cybercrime” charges.

---

4. The Bigger Picture: A Wealth Transfer Scheme

T-Bonds are not about development—they are about:
✅ Funding political patronage (contracts for loyalists).
✅ Masking budget deficits (due to corruption and waste).
✅ Exploiting citizen patriotism while elites profit.

“When the shepherd steals from the flock, even the grass grows thinner.”

---

Demand Transparency or Stop Investing

Rwandans deserve real answers:

• Full project disclosures—Where does each bond franc go?

• Independent audits—Who is stealing, and why are they unpunished?

• Whistleblower protection—Why are truth-tellers silenced?

Until then, T-Bonds are not nation-building—they are a scam.

The choice is clear:

• Keep funding corruption blindly, or

• Demand accountability before investing another franc.

5.The Illusion of Liquidity: How Rwanda’s Treasury Bonds Trap Investors

“A market without buyers is like a river without water—it may exist on maps, but it cannot quench thirst.”

The Rwandan government promotes Treasury Bonds (T-Bonds) as a liquid investment, claiming investors can easily sell them on the Rwanda Stock Exchange (RSE) if they need cash. But this is a dangerous myth. In reality, the RSE suffers from abysmal trading volumes, meaning bondholders are often trapped in their investments—unable to exit without massive losses.

---

1. The False Promise of “Easy Selling”

A. The Government’s Claim vs. Reality

✅ What the National Bank of Rwanda (BNR) Says:

• “T-Bonds can be sold anytime on the RSE.”

• “Investors have flexibility to exit when needed.”

❌ The Truth:

• The RSE is one of Africa’s smallest and least liquid markets.

• Less than 1% of bonds listed actually trade monthly.

• Most sellers must slash prices drastically to find a buyer—if one exists at all.

B. The Numbers Don’t Lie

• Average daily RSE bond trades: Rwf 50-100 million (vs. Rwf 60 billion in bonds issued in early 2024).

• Some bonds go months without a single trade.

• Bid-Ask spreads are huge (sometimes 10-15% gaps), meaning sellers lose heavily.

“A market where no one buys is not a market—it is a graveyard for money.”

---

2. Why the RSE Fails Bondholders

A. Structural Problems: A Dead Exchange

• Too few participants: Only a handful of institutional traders (banks, pension funds) dominate.

• No retail investor interest: Ordinary Rwandans don’t trade bonds; they buy and hold (or get stuck).

• Government manipulation: The BNR sometimes intervenes to prop up prices, but only for select players.

B. The “Rediscounting Window” Scam

The BNR claims it will buy back bonds if no market buyer exists. But:

• No clear rules on pricing (they can lowball you).

• Delays of weeks or months before cash is released.

• Only available to big players—small investors are ignored.

C. Real-Life Consequences

• Case Study (2023): A teacher who invested Rwf 5 million in bonds needed emergency cash for medical bills. After three months of trying to sell, he finally got Rwf 4.2 million—a 16% loss.

---

3. Who Benefits from This Illusion?

✅ The Government:

• Locks in long-term funding with no fear of mass sell-offs.

✅ Banks & Brokers:

• Earn fees on bond sales, even if clients can’t exit.

❌ Ordinary Investors:

• Trapped in “safe” investments that can’t be sold.

• Forced to accept massive losses if they need cash urgently.

“When the market is dry, only the well-connected find water.”

---

4. The Bigger Picture: A Financial Prison

Rwanda’s bond market is designed to:

1. Prevent capital flight (people can’t easily cash out).

2. Force long-term funding for the state, regardless of investor needs.

3. Hide the system’s instability—if bonds were truly liquid, panic selling would expose risks.

---

Don’t Fall for the Liquidity Lie

Before investing in T-Bonds, ask:

• “If I need my money tomorrow, can I get it?” (Likely answer: No.)

• “Why does the government discourage other liquid investments?” (To keep control.)

Better Alternatives:

• High-yield savings accounts (some banks offer 7-9%).

• Land or property (real assets you can sell).

• Foreign currency holdings (if accessible).

Until the RSE becomes a real market—not just a state-controlled illusion—T-Bonds remain a trap, not an investment.

6. The “Rediscounting Window” Fallacy: Rwanda’s Broken Safety Net for Bondholders

“A promise written on water cannot quench fire when needed most.”

The National Bank of Rwanda (BNR) assures Treasury Bond (T-Bond) investors of a safety net—the “rediscounting window,” where the central bank supposedly buys back bonds if no market buyers exist. But this guarantee is largely theoretical, untested in crisis conditions, and likely to fail precisely when investors need it most.

---

1. The Illusion of a Guaranteed Exit

A. How the Rediscounting Window is Supposed to Work

✅ BNR’s Official Position:

• If an investor cannot sell bonds on the open market, they can approach BNR.

• The central bank will buy the bonds at a “fair” price (usually with a penalty rate).

❌ The Reality:

• No clear rules on pricing or timing—BNR has full discretion.

• No historical precedent of mass rediscounting—the system has never been stress-tested.

• Priority given to banks & institutions—retail investors face bureaucratic delays.

“A lifeboat that has never been used cannot be trusted in a storm.”

---

2. Why the Rediscounting Promise is a Myth

A. The Panic-Selling Scenario: What Happens in a Crisis?

• If too many investors try to exit bonds simultaneously (due to economic shocks, inflation spikes, or political instability), BNR:

  • Will impose limits (only accepting a small % of bonds).

  • Will slash prices (forcing massive losses on sellers).

  • May freeze rediscounting entirely (citing “market stability”).

B. Precedents from Other African Markets

• Nigeria (2020): When bond yields spiked, the central bank suspended secondary market sales to “protect liquidity.”

• Zambia (2022): During debt distress, the Bank of Zambia halted bond buybacks, leaving investors stranded.

Rwanda is no exception—when crisis hits, the state protects itself first.

C. Who Really Gets Protection?

• Banks & institutional investors receive preferential access.

• Small retail investors (teachers, farmers, civil servants) are last in line.

“When the lion hunts, the antelope are told to wait their turn—until none are left.”

---

3. The Hidden Risks for Ordinary Investors

A. BNR’s Conflict of Interest

• As both bond issuer and buyer of last resort, BNR has no incentive to offer fair prices.

• Example: If bonds drop 20% in the open market, BNR may only offer 30% below face value—a double loss.

B. No Legal Recourse

• Unlike in regulated markets, Rwandan investors cannot sue for unfair treatment.

• The central bank’s decisions are final and unchallengeable.

C. The Psychological Trap

• The mere illusion of liquidity encourages people to invest more than they can afford to lock up.

• When they need cash, they discover the exit door is sealed shut.

---

4. The Bigger Picture: A System Designed to Trap Capital

The rediscounting window is not a real safety net—it’s a psychological tool to:
✅ Lure more citizens into bonds (by reducing perceived risk).
✅ Prevent capital flight (by making exits difficult).
✅ Ensure long-term funding for the state (regardless of investor needs).

“A bird in a gilded cage is still a prisoner.”

---

Trust Actions, Not Promises

Before relying on BNR’s rediscounting window, investors must ask:

1. Has this ever worked in a crisis? (No.)

2. Will I really get my money when needed? (Unlikely.)

3. Why does the government discourage other liquid investments? (To maintain control.)

Better Alternatives for True Liquidity:

• High-yield savings accounts (some offer 7-9% with instant access).

• Land or property (can be sold privately if needed).

• Foreign currency holdings (if accessible).

Until Rwanda’s financial system offers real liquidity—not just empty promises—T-Bonds remain a gamble with your savings.

7. Predatory Interest Rate Manipulation: How Rwanda’s Bond Market Favours the Elite

“When elephants fight, it is the grass that suffers.”

The National Bank of Rwanda (BNR) presents Treasury Bond (T-Bond) auctions as a fair and transparent process where all investors—big and small—have an equal shot at securing attractive interest rates. In reality, the system is rigged in favour of institutional players, ensuring that banks, pension funds, and politically connected elites lock in the best rates, while ordinary Rwandans are left with scraps.

---

1. The Illusion of a “Competitive” Auction

A. How Bond Auctions Are Supposed to Work

✅ The Official Narrative:

• Investors submit bids specifying the yield (interest rate) they are willing to accept.

• The BNR accepts the lowest yields first (meaning those who accept lower returns get priority).

• The process is “market-driven” and fair to all.

❌ The Reality:

• Institutional investors (banks, pension funds, government-linked firms) dominate auctions, pushing yields down to levels that retail investors cannot compete with.

• Small investors, lacking financial muscle, are forced to accept whatever rate is left—often significantly lower.

“The lion may share the hunt, but the hyenas eat last—and least.”

---

2. How the System is Stacked Against Small Investors

A. The Big Players’ Advantage

• Bulk Bidding Power: Institutions bid for Rwf 500 million+ at a time, dwarfing individual Rwf 100,000-1 million bids.

• Inside Information: Well-connected players often have advance insights into rate trends, allowing them to optimise bids.

• Collusive Bidding: Some institutional investors coordinate to suppress yields, ensuring they get bonds at the cheapest rates.

B. The “Non-Competitive Bidding” Trap

• To appear inclusive, BNR allows non-competitive bids (where small investors accept whatever rate the auction sets).

• But this means:

  • They cannot negotiate—they get the worst rate of the auction.

  • Their returns are systematically lower than what big players secure.

C. Real-World Impact: A Widening Wealth Gap

• Example (June 2024 Auction):

  • Banks & pension funds secured a 12% yield by bidding aggressively.

  • Retail investors in the non-competitive

8. Rwanda’s Debt Crisis Looms: How Treasury Bonds Mask a Ticking Time Bomb

“When the river runs dry, even the crocodile grows thirsty.”

The Rwandan government markets Treasury Bonds (T-Bonds) as a tool for “national development,” but the alarming truth is that soaring public debt—now at 70.4% of GDP (World Bank, 2024)—has turned bond sales into a desperate scramble to keep the state solvent. Rather than funding transformative projects, these bonds are increasingly used to service old debts, plug budget deficits, and conceal fiscal mismanagement.

---

1. The Debt Trap: Rwanda’s Unsustainable Borrowing Spree

A. The Numbers Don’t Lie

• Public debt: 70.4% of GDP (up from 50% in 2019).

• External debt: $4.1 billion (40% of GDP).

• Debt servicing costs: 25% of government revenue (IMF, 2024).

“A man who borrows to pay his debts is running in circles—until he collapses.”

B. The Vicious Cycle of Debt

1. New bonds are issued to repay old ones (a Ponzi-like scheme).

2. Foreign lenders (China, World Bank) demand repayment, forcing more borrowing.

3. Tax revenues fall short, so the state turns to domestic bonds—saddling citizens with the burden.

C. Case Study: The 2024 Eurobond Rollover

• In early 2024, Rwanda quietly delayed repayment on a $300 million Eurobond.

• Instead of admitting cash flow problems, the government issued Rwf 60 billion in domestic bonds to “manage liquidity.”

---

2. Bond Sales: A Stopgap, Not a Solution

A. Where Does the Money Really Go?

• Less than 30% of bond proceeds fund new infrastructure.

• Over 50% goes to debt refinancing (paying old loans with new ones).

• The rest disappears into opaque budget expenditures (military, patronage projects).

B. The Hidden Risk of Domestic Debt Dominance

• Unlike foreign debt (which can be restructured), domestic bonds must be repaid in Rwandan francs.

• If the economy stumbles, the government faces two ugly choices:

  1. Print money → hyperinflation (like Zimbabwe).

  2. Default on citizens → wiped-out savings (like Zambia in 2020).

“When the house is on fire, even the furniture becomes fuel.”

---

3. Who Bears the Brunt? Ordinary Rwandans

A. Crowding Out the Private Sector

• Banks prefer lending to the government (safe, high-yield bonds) over businesses.

• Result: Small firms starved of credit, stifling job creation.

B. Future Tax Bombshells

• Today’s bond debts will be repaid by tomorrow’s taxpayers.

• Example: A Rwf 15 billion bond maturing in 2030 means higher taxes or spending cuts for future generations.

C. The Elite Escape Unscathed

• Wealthy investors diversify into dollars and land.

• The poor, holding bonds in a depreciating franc, face ruin if inflation spikes.

---

4. The Bigger Picture: A Looming Economic Crisis

Rwanda’s debt trajectory mirrors pre-crisis Ghana and Zambia:
✅ Rising debt-to-GDP (now in the IMF’s “danger zone”).
✅ Growing reliance on domestic bonds (a red flag for fiscal stress).
✅ No credible plan to curb spending (megaprojects continue unchecked).

“A government that spends tomorrow’s money today will leave its people begging yesterday’s creditors.”

---

Wake Up Before the Crash

Rwandans must ask:

1. Why is debt soaring while poverty remains high?

2. Where are the audits of bond spending?

3. Will my bond savings be worthless if the franc collapses?

Better Alternatives for Savers:

• Hard assets (land, gold) – Inflation-proof.

• Foreign currency (USD accounts) – Hedge against devaluation.

• Private sector investments – Support real growth, not state debt.

The truth is clear: Rwanda’s T-Bonds are no longer about “—development”—they are a financial time bomb.

9. The “Patriotic Investment” Scam: How Rwanda’s Regime Exploits Citizen Loyalty

“A wolf in shepherd’s clothing still has sharp teeth.”

The Rwandan government has masterfully repackaged Treasury Bonds (T-Bonds) as a patriotic duty, framing investment as a way for citizens to “build their nation.” But beneath this noble rhetoric lies a cynical manipulation—using financial coercion to fund an authoritarian regime while silencing dissent. This is not true patriotism; it is financial repression disguised as national pride.

---

1. The Emotional Blackmail of “Patriotic Bonds”

A. The Government’s Narrative

✅ Propaganda Messages:

• “Invest in bonds to support Rwanda’s development.”

• “Your money builds schools, hospitals, and roads.”

• “True patriots don’t just talk—they invest in their country.”

❌ The Reality:

• No transparency on how bond revenues are actually spent.

• No accountability for disappeared funds or failed projects.

• No choice—public sector workers, soldiers, and civil society are pressured to buy bonds under the guise of “national duty.”

“When the shepherd demands wool from a sick sheep, it is not care—it is exploitation.”

---

2. How the Regime Weaponizes Patriotism

A. Forced “Voluntary” Participation

• Civil servants report being strongly encouraged (read: coerced) to invest in bonds.

• Local officials set “bond purchase targets” for communities.

• Military & police face implicit pressure to demonstrate “loyalty” through bond investments.

B. The Distraction from Repression

While citizens are told to “invest in Rwanda’s future,” the government:

• Jails journalists and activists (e.g., The Rwanda Briefing 2023 report documented 17 imprisoned critics).

• Rigs elections (Kagame’s 99% “victories” are a global joke).

• Censors media (RSF ranks Rwanda 147/180 in press freedom).

“A nation that silences its people cannot claim to speak for them.”

---

3. The Hypocrisy of Elite “Patriotism”

A. The Ruling Class Opts Out

While ordinary Rwandans are guilt-tripped into bonds:

• Regime elites stash wealth in Dubai real estate, Swiss accounts, and dollar assets.

• Military-linked businessmen win inflated contracts funded by bonds—then siphon profits offshore.

B. The False Promise of Shared Prosperity

• GDP grows, but poverty persists (55% live below $2/day).

• Bond-funded “development” benefits urban elites, while rural Rwandans see little change.

“When the king eats from golden plates, the people are told to lick the crumbs—and call it a feast.”

---

4. The Bigger Picture: Financial Authoritarianism

This is not just about bonds—it’s about control:
✅ Economic Control: Trap citizens’ wealth in state-managed instruments.
✅ Political Control: Frame dissent as “unpatriotic.”
✅ Social Control: Reward loyalty, punish scepticism.

Parallels to Other Dictatorships:

• China’s “patriotic education” – Used to justify repression.

• Zimbabwe’s war bonds – A scam that wiped out savings.

---

Real Patriotism Demands Accountability

True patriots don’t blindly fund their government—they question, challenge, and demand transparency.

What You Can Do:

1. Reject emotional blackmail – Investing under duress is not patriotism.

2. Demand audits – Where do bond billions really go?

3. Diversify savings – Land, forex, and private assets reduce regime leverage.

“A country that fears its people’s questions cannot claim to love their contributions.”

Until Rwanda’s leaders stop conflating dissent with disloyalty, T-Bonds will remain a tool of exploitation—not empowerment.

10. The Minimum Investment Trap: How Rwanda’s Treasury Bonds Exclude the Poor and Enrich the Elite

“When the river is only deep enough for elephants, the antelope will always go thirsty.”

The Rwandan government claims that Treasury Bonds (T-Bonds) are an “inclusive” investment, open to all with a minimum buy-in of Rwf 100,000. But this seemingly accessible threshold is a cruel illusion—for the vast majority of Rwandans, this amount represents months of impossible savings, making bonds a financial instrument reserved for the privileged few.

---

1. The Harsh Reality of Rwandan Incomes

A. What Rwf 100,000 Really Means

• Average monthly wage: ~Rwf 30,000 (urban informal workers) to Rwf 60,000 (lower-tier civil servants).

• Rural farmers: Often earn less than Rwf 20,000/month after costs.

• Household expenses: A single medical emergency or school fee can wipe out an entire year’s savings.

“A man who must choose between buying bonds and buying food has no choice at all.”

B. Who Can Actually Afford Bonds?

✅ The Elite:

• Government officials, military officers, and business elites who earn Rwf 500,000+ monthly.

• Bank managers and corporate employees with disposable income.

❌ The Poor (80% of Rwanda):

• Market vendors, motorcycle taxi drivers, and subsistence farmers—for whom Rwf 100,000 is unthinkable liquidity.

• Domestic workers earning Rwf 15,000-25,000/month.

---

2. The Deceptive Marketing of “Financial Inclusion”

A. The Government’s Narrative

• “Anyone can invest!”

• “Start with just Rwf 100,000!”

• “Grow your savings like the wealthy do!”

B. The Ugly Truth

• Bonds are mathematically impossible for most.

  • Saving Rwf 5,000/month would take 20 months to reach Rwf 100,000—with no emergencies.

• Informal workers lack documentation to even open a CSD account (required for bond purchases).

• Rural citizens face banking deserts—many must travel hours to a branch.

“When the ladder is placed too high, the promise of climbing is a taunt, not an opportunity.”

---

3. Who Really Benefits? The Same Old Networks

A. The Political Capitalist Class

• Regime-linked investors buy bonds in bulk (Rwf 50M+ bids), securing the best rates.

• Bank executives earn commissions on bond sales—while their clients lose to inflation.

B. The Illusion of Democratised Finance

• Less than 3% of Rwandans hold bonds (BNR data, 2023).

• Most bondholders are urban elites—Kigali residents dominate the market.

C. The Exploitation of Hope

The government sells bonds as an escape from poverty, knowing full well:

• The poor cannot afford entry.

• Even if they could, returns are gutted by inflation and fees.

---

4. The Bigger Picture: A System Designed to Favour the Few

This is not an accident—it’s by design:
✅ Exclusionary finance keeps wealth concentrated.
✅ False “inclusion” rhetoric pacifies critics.
✅ Debt dependence grows as citizens are locked out of real wealth-building.

Parallels in History:

• Colonial-era cash crops – Promised prosperity, but only for compradors.

• Microfinance scams – “For the poor” in theory, predatory in practice.

---

Bonds Are a Luxury the Poor Cannot Afford

Until Rwanda addresses:

1. Poverty wages (why is the minimum wage still not a living wage?).

2. Real financial inclusion (postal banking, mobile-first bond access).

3. Wealth inequality (why do 5% control 80% of bonds?).

T-Bonds will remain a cruel joke—a “wealth-building” tool for those who already have wealth.

“A chain is only as strong as its weakest link—but what if the chain was never meant to hold everyone?”

Alternatives for Ordinary Rwandans:

• Savings groups (ibimina) – Community-based, low-barrier.

• Land pooling – Collective ownership beats inaccessible bonds.

• Informal forex (USD/Francs) – Hedge against inflation.

The truth is clear: If Rwanda truly wanted inclusive investment, it would start by paying inclusive wages.

11. The Black Box of Rwanda’s Treasury Bonds: How Billions Vanish Without a Trace

“Sunlight is the best disinfectant, but in Rwanda’s bond market, the curtains are always drawn.”

The Rwandan government claims that Treasury Bond (T-Bond) proceeds fund “national development” – roads, schools, hospitals, and electricity. Yet, despite billions of francs raised annually, there is no transparent accounting of where this money actually goes. No independent audits. No project-specific disclosures. Just vague promises and empty slogans, while the politically connected profit.

---

1. The Illusion of Accountability

A. The Government’s Hollow Claims

✅ Official Statements:

• “Bonds finance transformative infrastructure.”

• “Every franc is accounted for in the national budget.”

❌ The Reality:

• No detailed public records of which projects receive bond funding.

• No third-party audits to verify spending.

• No consequences for mismanagement or corruption.

“A thief who keeps no ledger cannot be accused of stealing.”

B. Case Study: The Rwf 60 Billion Bond (March-June 2024)

• Claim: Funds allocated to “priority infrastructure.”

• Reality:

  • No project list published.

  • No site visits allowed for journalists.

  • No contractor disclosures.

---

2. How Bond Money Disappears

A. The Opaque Budget Process

• Rwanda’s budget is passed in hours, with no meaningful parliamentary scrutiny.

• “Confidential expenditures” (military, security, presidential projects) swallow huge sums.

B. Phantom Projects & Inflated Contracts

• Example 1: A 2023 Rwf 8 billion “rural electrification” bond – yet multiple districts report no new power lines.

• Example 2: The Kigali Innovation City – billions spent, but no audited cost breakdown.

C. Elite Capture

• Companies linked to military & ruling party officials win most bond-funded tenders.

• Kickbacks are rampant – but whistleblowers face arrest.

“When the fox guards the henhouse, the chickens will always go missing.”

---

3. The Consequences of Secrecy

A. Citizens Fund Their Own Exploitation

• Teachers, farmers, and market vendors lose savings to inflation while elites profit.

• No recourse when projects fail or funds vanish.

B. Rwanda’s Growing Debt Trap

• Bonds are not driving development – they’re fuelling debt refinancing and corruption.

• Future generations will pay for today’s stolen billions.

---

4. The Bigger Picture: A Dictatorship’s Financial Playbook

This is not incompetence – it is deliberate obfuscation, seen in:
✅ Zimbabwe’s “Command Agriculture” – Billions vanished.
✅ Angola’s Sovereign Wealth Fund – Looted by the Dos Santos family.

“A government that fears transparency fears its own people.”

---

Demand Proof or Stop Investing

Rwandans must ask:

1. Where are the audited project reports?

2. Why are contractors secret?

3. Who profits from this system?

Until then, T-Bonds are not nation-building – they are a wealth extraction scheme.

“A people who cannot follow their money will always be poor.”

12. The False Promise of Stability: How Rwanda’s Treasury Bonds Rest on Shaky Ground

“A house built on borrowed pillars will collapse when the lenders take them back.”

The Rwandan government markets Treasury Bonds (T-Bonds) as a stable, low-risk investment, assuring citizens that their money is safe because the state backs it. However, this stability is a dangerous illusion—Rwanda’s economy is heavily dependent on foreign aid, which accounts for 30% of the national budget (World Bank, 2024). If donor funding dries up, the government’s ability to repay bonds would crumble, leaving investors with worthless paper.

---

1. The Fragile Foundations of Rwanda’s Economy

A. Foreign Aid: The Invisible Crutch

✅ Current Reliance:

• 30% of Rwanda’s budget comes from foreign donors (EU, UK, USA, World Bank).

• Critical sectors (healthcare, education, infrastructure) depend on grants.

❌ The Hidden Risk:

• Donor priorities shift with geopolitics (e.g., UK cuts to Rwanda over asylum disputes).

• Human rights criticisms could trigger further aid suspensions.

“A beggar’s bowl is only full until the giver changes his mind.”

B. What Happens If Aid Stops?

• Budget deficits explode → More desperate bond sales.

• Currency devaluation → Bond returns (in francs) lose real value.

• Default risk rises → Investors panic-sell, crashing the market.

---

2. The Myth of “Government Guaranteed” Safety

A. The State’s Empty Promises

• BNR claims: “T-Bonds are risk-free because the government cannot default.”

• Reality:

  • Zambia (2020) & Ghana (2022) also claimed this—before defaulting.

  • Rwanda already delayed Eurobond repayments in 2024.

B. The Debt Spiral

• Public debt = 70.4% of GDP (World Bank, 2024).

• Bonds are increasingly used to repay old loans, not fund development.

“When you borrow from Peter to pay Paul, soon both will come knocking.”

---

3. Who Pays When the Music Stops? Ordinary Citizens

A. The Coming Wealth Destruction

• If Rwanda faces a balance-of-payments crisis (like Sri Lanka in 2022):

  • Bondholders’ savings wiped out by inflation or default.

  • Pension funds (which hold bonds) collapse, hurting retirees.

B. The Elite’s Escape Plan

• Officials and generals store wealth in Dubai real estate and USD.

• The poor, holding local-currency bonds, are left holding the bag.

---

4. The Bigger Picture: A Ticking Time Bomb

Rwanda’s economy mirrors pre-crisis Zambia & Ghana:
✅ Aid-dependent (unsustainable).
✅ Debt-ridden (growing faster than GDP).
✅ No Plan B (if donors leave, bonds crash).

“A nation that lives on charity cannot promise prosperity.”

---

Don’t Bet Your Future on a Mirage

Before investing in T-Bonds, ask:

1. What happens if Western donors cut funding?

2. Can Rwanda really repay without aid?

3. Why do elites keep their wealth abroad, not in bonds?

Better Alternatives:

• Land (real asset, inflation-proof).

• USD/Forex (hedge against franc collapse).

• Private businesses (true wealth creation).

The truth is clear: Rwanda’s “stable” bonds are a house of cards—one strong wind away from collapse.

13. The Elite’s Insider Trading: How Rwanda’s Treasury Bonds Are Rigged for the Privileged

“When the game is fixed, even the fastest runner cannot win.”

The Rwandan government presents Treasury Bonds (T-Bonds) as a fair and transparent investment opportunity for all citizens. In reality, the system is stacked in favour of well-connected elites, who receive advance knowledge of bond terms, preferential rates, and exclusive bidding opportunities—leaving ordinary Rwandans at a permanent disadvantage.

---

1. The Illusion of a “Level Playing Field”

A. How Bond Auctions Are Supposed to Work

✅ The Official Narrative:

• All investors receive the same information at the same time.

• Interest rates are set through competitive, market-driven auctions.

• Everyone has an equal chance to secure the best yields.

❌ The Reality:

• Insiders (banks, military-linked investors, government officials) get early access to bond details.

• Pre-auction deals are made behind closed doors.

• Retail investors are left with whatever scraps remain.

“The lion may share the hunt, but only after he has taken the choicest meat.”

---

2. How Insider Trading Works in Rwanda’s Bond Market

A. Advance Notice for the Connected Few

• Bank executives, military officers, and ruling party elites receive pre-release bond terms (maturity, yield ranges) days before public announcements.

• This allows them to:

  • Structure their bids optimally (maximising returns).

  • Shift funds in advance (while ordinary investors scramble).

B. “Preferred Bidders” and Backroom Deals

• Institutional investors (pension funds, state-linked corporations) often pre-negotiate rates with the National Bank of Rwanda (BNR).

• Example (2024): A Rwf 15 billion bond had 40% pre-allocated to “strategic investors” before public bidding even opened.

C. The Non-Competitive Bidding Scam

• Small investors are pushed into non-competitive bids, meaning:

  • They cannot negotiate rates—they accept whatever the elites have already secured.

  • They systematically earn lower returns.

---

3. The Consequences: A Financial System Designed to Enrich the Few

A. Widening Wealth Inequality

• Elites compound wealth through high-yield, low-risk bond access.

• Ordinary citizens get paltry returns, locking them into perpetual economic stagnation.

B. Eroding Public Trust

• When markets are rigged, citizens lose faith in all financial systems.

• This discourages real investment and fuels capital flight.

“A tree cannot grow when its roots are poisoned.”

---

4. The Bigger Picture: A Classic Authoritarian Economic Model

Rwanda is not unique—this mirrors:
✅ China’s “guanxi” capitalism – Where connections trump merit.
✅ Zimbabwe’s bond market – Where military elites profited while citizens suffered.

The playbook is simple:

1. Control information (limit who knows what).

2. Reward loyalty (give insiders the best deals).

3. Exploit the masses (sell them the leftovers).

---

Demand Transparency or Refuse to Play

Before investing in T-Bonds, ask:

1. How do some bidders always secure the best rates?

2. Why are bond terms leaked to elites first?

3. When will Rwanda enforce SEC-style insider trading laws?

Better Alternatives for Ordinary Rwandans:

• Land & real assets (cannot be manipulated by insiders).

• Foreign currency (outside government control).

• Private businesses (true wealth creation).

Until Rwanda’s bond market is truly open, it remains a rigged game—where the house always wins, and the people always lose.

14. The Distraction from Real Economic Problems: How Rwanda’s Bond Market Masks Systemic Failures

“When the roof is leaking, no amount of polishing the floor will keep the house dry.”

The Rwandan government aggressively promotes Treasury Bonds (T-Bonds) as a pathway to prosperity, urging citizens to invest in “national development.” Yet this narrative is a deliberate distraction from the country’s deepening economic crises—chronic unemployment (over 20%), staggering poverty (55% living below $2/day), and youth disillusionment. Rather than addressing these structural issues, the regime peddles bonds as a false solution, masking its inability (or unwillingness) to deliver inclusive growth.

---

1. Rwanda’s Glaring Economic Contradictions

A. The Harsh Reality for Ordinary Citizens

✅ Official GDP Growth (7%+ annually):

• Touted as evidence of Rwanda’s “economic miracle.”

❌ Lived Experience of the Majority:

• Unemployment: 20%+ (NISR, 2024)—higher among youth.

• Underemployment: Millions survive on informal, precarious work.

• Poverty: 55% live below $2/day (World Bank, 2024).

“A nation is not rich when its GDP grows, but when its people can eat.”

B. The Bond Market Mirage

• Bonds do nothing to create jobs or raise wages.

• They transfer wealth from citizens to the state, enabling:

  • Debt refinancing (not job creation).

  • Opaque spending (not poverty reduction).

---

2. Why Bonds Are a False “Solution”

A. The Misplaced Priorities

Instead of tackling unemployment and inequality, the government:

1. Spends billions on vanity projects (e.g., Kigali Convention Centre, luxury hotels).

2. Subsidises elite-linked businesses (e.g., military-owned construction firms).

3. Diverts attention with bond propaganda (“Invest for Rwanda!”).

B. The Cruel Irony

• A teacher earning Rwf 50,000/month is urged to “invest” in bonds—while struggling to afford rent.

• A farmer battling rising fertiliser costs is told bonds will “build the nation”—as his children go hungry.

“You cannot feed a family with a treasury coupon.”

---

3. The Regime’s True Motives: Control Over Reform

A. Suppressing Economic Dissent

By framing bonds as “patriotic,” the government:

• Shifts blame (“Poverty is your fault for not investing!”).

• Avoids hard reforms (land redistribution, wage hikes, SME support).

B. The Elite’s Win-Win Game

• Officials & generals profit from bond-funded contracts.

• Banks & brokers earn fees on sales.

• The poor are left with useless paper and empty promises.

---

4. The Bigger Picture: A Replay of Failed Policies

Rwanda mirrors pre-crisis Zimbabwe’s playbook:
✅ Debt-driven “growth” (while poverty festers).
✅ Propaganda over substance (“Look at our shiny bonds, not your empty plate!”).

“A government that builds stock exchanges before hospitals has its priorities backwards.”

---

Demand Real Solutions, Not Financial Theatre

Rwandans must reject this economic sleight-of-hand and demand:

1. Job creation (not bond sales).

2. Living wages (not 5% tax gimmicks).

3. Transparent budgets (not vanished billions).

Alternatives That Actually Help the Poor:

• Cooperative farming grants (not bond lockups).

• Vocational training programs (not elite-focused “innovation hubs”).

• Small business loans (not predatory microfinance).

The truth is clear: Until Rwanda’s leaders stop prioritising optics over livelihoods, T-Bonds will remain a cruel joke on the working class.

15. The Myth of “Financial Inclusion”: How Rwanda’s Treasury Bonds Exclude the Masses

“You cannot teach a man to swim if he has no access to water.”

The Rwandan government proudly declares that Treasury Bonds (T-Bonds) promote financial inclusion, offering all citizens a chance to “participate in national development.” Yet this claim crumbles under scrutiny—less than 15% of Rwandans have bank accounts (World Bank, 2024), and even fewer can navigate the bureaucratic maze required to invest in bonds. Far from being inclusive, T-Bonds are a privileged financial tool for the urban elite, leaving the rural poor, informal workers, and ordinary citizens locked out of the system.

---

1. The Stark Reality of Financial Exclusion

A. Who Actually Has Access to Bonds?

✅ The Privileged Few (15%):

• Urban professionals, civil servants, and business owners with formal bank accounts.

• Those who can afford the Rwf 100,000 minimum investment (3+ months’ wages for many).

❌ The Excluded Majority (85%):

• Rural farmers (often unbanked, reliant on cash).

• Market vendors & motorcycle taxi drivers (informal income, no financial records).

• Low-wage workers (struggling to save, let alone invest).

“A financial system that ignores the poor is not inclusive—it is exploitative.”

---

2. The Barriers to “Inclusion”

A. The Bureaucratic Gauntlet

To buy a bond, one must:

1. Open a Central Securities Depository (CSD) account (requires ID, proof of address, bank account).

2. Navigate a bank or broker (many rural areas have none).

3. Understand complex financial terms (most Rwandans lack basic financial literacy).

B. The Digital Divide

• Mobile money (M-Pesa) is widespread, but bonds cannot be bought via phone.

• Rural internet access is patchy, locking out online applications.

C. The Minimum Investment Trap

• Rwf 100,000 is unattainable for:

  • A farmer earning Rwf 20,000/month.

  • A domestic worker saving Rwf 5,000/month.

“When the gate is too high, only the tall can enter.”

---

3. The Hypocrisy of “Inclusive Finance” Rhetoric

A. The Government’s Double Standard

While preaching inclusion, the regime:

• Denies microfinance reforms (keeping the poor trapped in debt).

• Spends billions on elite projects (Kigali skyscrapers, not rural banks).

• Ignores informal sector needs (no pension or bond options for moto-taxi drivers).

B. The Elite’s Monopoly on Wealth-Building

• Bonds are dominated by banks, pension funds, and military-linked investors.

• Smallholders are an afterthought, used as political props in “financial literacy” campaigns.

“A chain is only as strong as its weakest link—but Rwanda’s financial system deliberately leaves out the weak.”

---

4. The Bigger Picture: Exclusion as Policy

This is not accidental—it is by design:
✅ Control: Keeping wealth concentrated ensures political loyalty.
✅ Exploitation: The poor stay dependent on state handouts.
✅ Propaganda: “Inclusion” slogans mask systemic exclusion.

Parallels in History:

• Colonial-era banking – Designed to serve the few.

• Apartheid economics – Separate and unequal systems.

---

Real Inclusion Requires Systemic Change

For bonds to be truly inclusive, Rwanda must:

1. Lower barriers (allow mobile money investments, reduce minimums).

2. Expand rural banking (postal banks, agent networks).

3. Prioritise poverty reduction (not elite-focused bond markets).

Until then, T-Bonds will remain a privilege of the connected—not a tool for the people.

“A nation cannot prosper when half its people are locked out of wealth.”

16. The Hidden Fees: How Middlemen Eat Into Rwanda’s Already Meagre Bond Returns

“When the vultures feast, the lion’s share is never for the antelope.”

The Rwandan government promotes Treasury Bonds (T-Bonds) as a straightforward way for citizens to grow their savings. But beneath the surface lurks a predatory fee structure—banks, brokers, and financial intermediaries quietly skim off commissions, custody fees, and transaction costs, further eroding the already modest returns for ordinary investors. What is sold as a “safe investment” often becomes a wealth transfer scheme, where the financial elite profit at the expense of small bondholders.

---

1. The Invisible Tax on Small Investors

A. How Fees Chip Away at Returns

✅ Advertised Bond Yield: 10-12% (before inflation & tax).
❌ Real Returns After Fees: Often below inflation (5-7%), making gains negligible.

Breakdown of Hidden Costs:

1. Brokerage Commission (1-2%) – Charged per transaction (buying/selling).

2. Custody Fees (0.5-1% annually) – For holding bonds in a CSD account.

3. Bank Charges (Rwf 5,000-10,000 per bid) – Administrative fees.

4. Early Redemption Penalties (if applicable) – Up to 3% for selling before maturity.

“A river loses its force when too many streams divert its flow.”

---

2. Who Really Benefits? The Financial Middlemen

A. Banks & Brokers: The Silent Winners

• Commercial banks (BK, Equity, Bank of Kigali) earn millions in fees from bond sales.

• Stockbrokers (like CDH Capital) take cuts on every transaction.

• The National Bank of Rwanda (BNR) profits from bond issuance costs.

B. The Small Investor’s Burden

• A teacher investing Rwf 500,000 could lose Rwf 15,000-25,000 annually to fees—wiping out half their real returns.

• Rural investors, already struggling with access, pay disproportionately more due to transport and agent costs.

---

3. The Deceptive Marketing: “Low-Cost” Bonds?

A. The Government’s Misleading Claims

• “Investing in bonds is cost-effective!”

• “Minimal fees for long-term gains!”

B. The Ugly Truth

• Fees are rarely disclosed upfront—many investors only realise them after seeing reduced payouts.

• Financial literacy is low, so most Rwandans don’t question where their money is leaking.

“A thief in the night steals more than one in daylight.”

---

4. The Bigger Picture: A System Designed to Favour Intermediaries

This is not an accident—it’s by design:
✅ Banks & brokers lobby to keep fees opaque.
✅ The state benefits from a financial system where elites skim profits.
✅ Small investors, lacking alternatives, are forced to accept exploitation.

Parallels in History:

• Colonial-era middlemen – Tax collectors who impoverished farmers.

• Microfinance scandals – Where hidden fees trapped the poor in debt.

---

 Demand Transparency or Walk Away

Before investing in T-Bonds, ask:

1. What fees will I pay? (Demand a full breakdown.)

2. Are there cheaper alternatives? (Land, forex, savings groups.)

3. Why doesn’t the government cap fees? (Because the system serves the powerful.)

Until Rwanda enforces fair pricing, T-Bonds will remain a game where the house always wins—and the people always lose.

“A wise man counts not just his coins, but the hands that take them.”

17. The Regime’s History of Default Risks: Why Rwanda’s Treasury Bonds Are Not as Safe as Advertised

“A snake may shed its skin, but it does not change its nature.”

The Rwandan government markets Treasury Bonds (T-Bonds) as risk-free investments, guaranteed by the state. Yet history tells a different story—Rwanda has already restructured debt in 2020 and faced Eurobond repayment delays, proving that even “stable” regimes can stumble into financial distress. If past behaviour predicts future risk, what assurance do bondholders truly have that their money is safe?

---

1. Rwanda’s Debt Troubles: A Pattern, Not an Exception

A. The 2020 Debt Restructuring

• What Happened?

  • Rwanda quietly renegotiated terms on external loans amid COVID-19 pressures.

  • Creditors (including China and the World Bank) granted extended repayment periods.

• Why It Matters:

  • A precedent was set—Rwanda can and will adjust debt obligations when strained.

  • No public accountability—citizens were never told the full story.

“A debtor who delays once will delay again when the purse runs dry.”

B. The 2024 Eurobond “Liquidity Management”

• The Situation:

  • Rwanda postponed a $300 million Eurobond repayment, citing “market conditions.”

  • The government issued Rwf 60 billion in domestic bonds to cover the gap.

• The Red Flag:

  • If Rwanda struggles with foreign currency debt, what happens if franc revenues fall short?

---

2. Why Another Default or Restructuring Is Possible

A. Rising Debt-to-GDP (70.4% and Climbing)

• IMF threshold for risk: 55% for low-income countries.

• Debt servicing costs now eat 25% of government revenue (World Bank, 2024).

B. Dependence on Unreliable Revenue Streams

1. Foreign Aid (30% of budget) – Donor fatigue is growing.

2. Mineral Exports (Tin, Coltan) – Prices fluctuate wildly.

3. Tourism (Post-COVID recovery) – Still volatile.

“A man who builds his house on shifting sand should not be surprised when it collapses.”

C. Currency Risk: The Franc’s Vulnerability

• If the Rwandan franc depreciates further (as in 2022-23), debt servicing becomes more expensive.

• Bondholders are paid in francs, but the government’s external debts are in dollars—a dangerous mismatch.

---

3. Who Bears the Brunt? Ordinary Bondholders

A. The State’s Escape Routes (That Citizens Don’t Have)

• Print more francs → Inflation destroys bond values.

• Prioritise foreign creditors → Domestic bondholders get paid last (or never).

B. Lessons from Zambia & Ghana

• Both countries defaulted on domestic bonds during debt crises.

• Small investors lost everything, while IMF bailouts protected foreign lenders.

“When the storm comes, the big trees survive—the grass is swept away.”

---

4. The Bigger Picture: A Looming Fiscal Crisis

Rwanda’s economic model is unsustainable:
✅ Debt-fueled growth (like pre-crisis Sri Lanka).
✅ Opaque financial management (no real audits).
✅ Elite protectionism (officials stash wealth abroad).

The warning signs are flashing—will bondholders listen?

---

Trust Actions, Not Promises

Before investing in T-Bonds, ask:

1. If Rwanda restructured debt before, why won’t it again?

2. Where is the contingency plan if aid or exports collapse?

3. Why do officials keep wealth offshore if bonds are “safe”?

Better Alternatives for True Security:

• Land & real assets (no default risk).

• Foreign currency holdings (hedge against franc collapse).

• Private business equity (real wealth creation).

The truth is clear: Rwanda’s bonds are only as safe as the regime’s fragile finances—and history says that safety is an illusion.

18. The False Comparison to Land/Real Estate: How Rwanda’s Regime Suppresses Tangible Wealth

“A man who owns land owns his future; a man who depends on bonds depends on the king’s mercy.”

The Rwandan government actively promotes Treasury Bonds (T-Bonds) as a superior alternative to land and real estate investments. Yet this comparison is not just misleading—it is a deliberate strategy to keep citizens financially dependent on state-controlled instruments while restricting private property rights. Unlike bonds, which lose value to inflation and default risks, land appreciates over time, provides collateral for loans, and offers true economic independence. So why does the regime push bonds while making land ownership increasingly difficult?

---

1. Land vs. Bonds: The Stark Difference in Wealth Preservation

A. Land as a Timeless Asset

✅ Appreciates naturally – Scarcity and population growth drive long-term value.
✅ Inflation-proof – Unlike bonds, land prices rise with currency devaluation.
✅ Generational wealth – Can be passed down, unlike bonds that mature and vanish.

❌ Bonds as a Depleting Asset

• Erode with inflation (real returns often negative after taxes/fees).

• No ownership rights – Just a temporary loan to the government.

• No utility – Land can be farmed, built on, or leased; bonds just sit idle.

“You cannot eat a bond certificate, but you can farm your land and feed your family.”

---

2. How the Regime Discourages Land Ownership

A. Onerous Regulations & Bureaucracy

• High transaction taxes (up to 10% of land value).

• Complex titling processes – Many rural citizens lack documentation.

• Forced villagisation (“imidugudu”) – Displaces farmers from ancestral lands.

B. State Land Grabs & “Development” Justifications

• “Public interest” seizures – Land taken for “infrastructure” but often sold to private developers.

• Military-linked land acquisitions – Elite officers and investors benefit.

C. Financial System Bias Against Land

• Banks prefer bonds as collateral (easier to control than physical assets).

• Mortgage access is restricted – Most Rwandans cannot leverage land for credit.

“When the shepherd owns all the pastures, the sheep must follow his rules.”

---

3. Why the Regime Pushes Bonds Over Land

A. Control Over Citizens’ Wealth

• Bonds keep savings liquid for the state (can print francs to repay, devaluing returns).

• Land ownership empowers citizens economically—a threat to centralized control.

B. Elite Profit from Property Restrictions

• Officials and generals buy up undervalued land, then profit from rezoning.

• Urban development projects (like Kigali condos) benefit insiders, not ordinary citizens.

C. The Illusion of “Modern” Finance

• Bonds are framed as “sophisticated,” while land is dismissed as “backward.”

• Yet globally, the wealthy always hold real assets—bonds are just one tool in a diversified portfolio.

“A fool trades his farm for a promise; a wise man keeps his deeds.”

---

4. The Bigger Picture: A Replay of Colonial-Era Extraction

Rwanda’s land policies mirror historical tactics:
✅ Belgian colonialists restricted land ownership to control the population.
✅ Post-genocide “reforms” centralized land under state influence.
✅ Today’s bond push ensures wealth remains in government hands.

The result? A nation where the elite own property, and the masses are left with paper promises.

---

Reject the False Choice

Rwandans must see through this economic manipulation:

1. Land is true security—bonds are a gamble on government stability.

2. Demand fair land rights—resist policies that favour elites.

3. Diversify wisely—if you must hold bonds, never at the expense of tangible assets.

The regime knows land is power—that’s why they don’t want you to own it.

“Plant your money in soil, not in promises.”

19. The Psychological Manipulation: How Rwanda’s Bond Propaganda Exploits Hope and Patriotism

“A clever hunter does not chase his prey—he lures it into a trap with sweet songs.”

Jean-Marie Rugambwa’s article, “Why You Should Consider Investing in Treasury Bonds,” is not financial advice—it is a masterclass in state-sponsored psychological manipulation. By weaving together themes of patriotism, hope, and national development, the regime preys on citizens’ deepest desires for a better future, disguising Treasury Bonds (T-Bonds) as both a wise investment and a civic duty. Yet beneath this emotional appeal lies a darker truth: the government is not empowering citizens—it is exploiting their trust to fund its own survival.

---

1. The Propaganda Playbook: How Hope Is Weaponised

A. The False Promise of “Nation-Building”

✅ The Narrative:

• “Your investment builds roads, schools, and hospitals!”

• “True patriots support Rwanda’s growth!”

❌ The Reality:

• No transparency on how bond proceeds are spent.

• No accountability for vanished funds.

• No measurable impact on poverty reduction.

“A man who is told to tighten his belt while the king feasts is not a citizen—he is a subject.”

B. The Emotional Triggers

1. Patriotism – Bonds are framed as a test of loyalty, making dissent seem unpatriotic.

2. Hope – The illusion that “your small savings will grow into wealth.”

3. Fear – The implied threat that not investing is selfish, harming national progress.

---

2. The Authoritarian Script: Lessons from Global Propaganda

A. Rwanda’s Bond Campaign vs. Classic Regime Tactics

B. The Distraction Technique

While citizens focus on “investing for the future,” the regime:

• Jails critics (over 20 political prisoners in 2023).

• Rigs elections (Kagame’s 99% victories).

• Diverts funds to elite projects (luxury hotels, military expansions).

“A dog that is fed just enough will never bite its master.”

---

3. The Psychological Trap: Why It Works

A. Cognitive Dissonance in Action

• Citizens want to believe in Rwanda’s “economic miracle.”

• Admitting that bonds are a bad deal would mean confronting broader systemic lies.

B. The Sunk Cost Fallacy

• Once people invest, they rationalise their choice—even as returns dwindle.

• This creates passive compliance (“I’ve put money in, so I must support the system”).

C. Social Pressure & Conformity

• Peer encouragement (“Everyone is investing!”).

• Fear of exclusion (“If I don’t participate, I’ll be left behind”).

---

4. The Bigger Picture: A Regime’s Blueprint for Control

This is not unique to Rwanda—it mirrors:
✅ North Korea’s “Patriotic Funds” – Citizens “donate” to the state.
✅ Zimbabwe’s War Bonds – Marketed as “national duty” before hyperinflation hit.

The goal? Keep citizens financially and psychologically dependent on the regime.

---

Break the Spell

To resist this manipulation, Rwandans must:

1. Recognise emotional triggers – Is this finance or indoctrination?

2. Demand proof, not promises – Where are the audited project reports?

3. Diversify beyond state-controlled assets – Land, forex, private businesses.

“A man who realises he is in a cage has taken the first step to freedom.”

True patriotism is not blind trust—it is holding power accountable.

20. The Bigger Picture: A Pyramid Scheme? Rwanda’s Debt-Fueled Illusion of Prosperity

“When the music stops, the last ones holding the bonds will be left with nothing but paper.”

Rwanda’s Treasury Bond (T-Bond) market bears the hallmarks of a Ponzi scheme: it depends on constant inflows of new money to pay off old investors while masking underlying insolvency. The government sells bonds not to fund genuine development, but to plug budget deficits, refinance old debts, and sustain an illusion of economic stability. But like all pyramid schemes, this model has an expiration date—when will the house of cards collapse?

---

1. How Rwanda’s Bond Market Mirrors a Ponzi Scheme

A. The Mechanics of a Debt Pyramid

✅ Stage 1: Attract New Investors

• The state lures citizens with promises of “safe, high-yield” returns.

• Patriotic appeals to pressure Rwandans to “invest in national development.”

✅ Stage 2: Use New Money to Pay Old Debts

• Bond revenues do not fund productive projects—they repay past loans.

• Example: In 2024, Rwf 60 billion in new bonds was used to refinance maturing debt.

✅ Stage 3: Repeat Until Collapse

• As debt grows (70.4% of GDP), the state needs even more bonds to avoid default.

• Eventually, investor confidence snaps, and the scheme unravels.

“A river cannot flow forever if its source runs dry.”

B. Red Flags of a Failing System

1. Debt-to-Revenue Ratio (25%) – Unsustainable (IMF warns above 20% is risky).

2. Foreign Aid Dependence (30% of budget) – Donors may pull out.

3. No Transparency in Spending – Where do bond billions really go?

---

2. Precedents: When Debt Pyramids Crumble

A. Zimbabwe’s War Bonds (2000s)

• Marketed as “patriotic,” but became worthless after hyperinflation.

• Citizens lost lifetimes of savings.

B. Greece’s Sovereign Debt Crisis (2010)

• Bonds were “safe” until suddenly, they weren’t.

• Pension funds collapsed, austerity ravaged the poor.

C. Rwanda’s Own 2020 Debt Restructuring

• A warning shot—proof the regime will delay payments if strained.

“History does not repeat, but it often rhymes.”

---

3. Who Will Pay When the Bubble Bursts?

A. The Elite’s Escape Plan

• Officials and generals store wealth in Dubai real estate and USD.

• Banks and brokers have already skimmed fees—they won’t suffer.

B. The Citizens Left Holding the Bag

• Teachers, farmers, and retirees will see bonds devalued or defaulted.

• Pension funds, heavily invested in T-Bonds, could implode.

“When the flood comes, the rich sail away on boats—the poor drown with the land.”

---

4. The Inevitable Breaking Point

A. Triggers for Collapse

1. Donor Withdrawal – If Western aid slows (e.g., over human rights).

2. Export Shock – Falling mineral/tourism revenues strain forex reserves.

3. Currency Crisis – Franc devaluation makes debt unpayable.

B. The Government’s Last Resorts

• Print Money → Hyperinflation (like Zimbabwe).

• Default → Frozen savings, bank runs.

---

Get Out Before the Crash

Rwandans must ask:

1. Why does the state need so many bonds if the economy is strong?

2. Where are the audited reports on bond spending?

3. Why do officials keep wealth abroad, not in bonds?

Act Now:

• Shift to tangible assets (land, gold, forex).

• Demand transparency—or stop investing.

• Prepare for the worst—pyramid schemes always fail.

“A wise man builds his house on stone, not on promises.”

 

---

Conclusion: A Fool’s Bargain – Why Rwanda’s Treasury Bonds Are a Trap, Not an Investment

“A man who trusts a corrupt government with his money is like a farmer who trusts a fox to guard his chickens.”

After dissecting Rwanda’s Treasury Bond (T-Bond) system, the conclusion is inescapable: these instruments are not a safe investment, but rather a financial trap designed to extract wealth from ordinary citizens while propping up an authoritarian regime. The government’s promises of “secure returns” and “nation-building” crumble under scrutiny, revealing a system built on deception, exclusion, and elite enrichment.

---

1. The Illusion vs. The Reality

“A clever lie travels far, but the truth eventually catches up.”

---

2. Who Really Benefits?

✅ The Regime – Uses bonds to fund patronage, not development.
✅ Banks & Brokers – Skim fees while investors lose.
✅ Military & Political Elites – Win inflated contracts from bond proceeds.

❌ Ordinary Rwandans – Get locked into low-yield traps while elites stash wealth abroad.

“When the feast is served, the strong eat first—the weak get the bones.”

---

3. The Fatal Flaws in the System

1. Debt Ponzi Scheme – New bonds repay old ones; unsustainable.

2. No Transparency – Where does the money go? No one knows.

3. Liquidity Mirage – Bonds can’t be sold easily; investors are trapped.

4. Inflation Erosion – Returns don’t keep pace with rising prices.

5. Psychological Manipulation – Bonds sold as patriotism, not finance.

“A chain is only as strong as its weakest link—and Rwanda’s bond market is all weak links.”

---

4. The Path Forward: Demand Reform or Walk Away

A. What Must Change?

• Independent audits of bond spending.

• Lower minimums so the poor can participate fairly.

• Inflation-protected bonds to preserve savings.

• Whistleblower protections to expose corruption.

B. What Can You Do?

1. Diversify – Land, forex, and private businesses are safer.

2. Question – Demand proof before investing.

3. Resist – Don’t let patriotism cloud financial judgment.

“A people who do not hold their leaders accountable will always be poor.”

---

Final Warning: The House Always Wins

Rwanda’s T-Bonds are not wealth-building tools—they are wealth extraction tools. Until there is:

• Real democracy,

• Transparent accounting, and

• Fair economic policies,

No Rwandan should trust their hard-earned money to this rigged system.

“The wise man builds his house on rock, not on the shifting sands of empty promises.”

The choice is yours: Keep feeding the beast, or demand better.

---

Final Thought: The Elite’s Silent Verdict on Rwanda’s Treasury Bonds

“When the cobra flees its own nest, wise men take heed.”

There exists a damning contradiction at the heart of Rwanda’s Treasury Bond (T-Bond) narrative: if these instruments were truly as safe and profitable as the government claims, why do Rwanda’s political and military elites consistently stash billions in foreign real estate, offshore accounts, and dollar assets rather than loading up on domestic bonds? Their actions speak louder than propaganda—they know something the average citizen isn’t being told.

---

1. The Hypocrisy of the Ruling Class

A. The Offshore Wealth Exodus

• Dubai Property Boom: Rwandan officials and generals rank among top African buyers of luxury flats in the UAE (African Property Review, 2024).

• European Bank Accounts: Over $300 million in Rwandan-linked private wealth sits in Swiss and Belgian banks (Tax Justice Network).

• Dollar Hoarding: While pushing franc-denominated bonds, elites convert savings to USD at the first sign of currency weakness.

“A thief does not store his loot in a house he plans to burn.”

B. The Bond Market Double Standard

✅ For Citizens:

• “Invest your Rwf 100,000 in bonds! It’s patriotic!”

• “Trust the state’s guarantee!”

❌ For Elites:

• Avoid bonds (too risky, low real returns).

• Diversify abroad (where wealth is safe from inflation and seizures).

---

2. The Unspoken Risks the Elite Understand

A. Currency Devaluation Trap

• The franc has lost 23% against the dollar since 2015 (BNR data).

• Bond returns are franc-denominated—elites prefer inflation-proof assets.

B. Default Precedents

• The 2020 debt restructuring proved Rwanda will delay payments when strained.

• Insiders know future defaults could wipe out bondholders.

C. Liquidity Lies

• Elites can’t exit bonds quickly (unlike Dubai property or USD cash).

• They refuse to be trapped like ordinary investors.

“The mouse that sees the cat’s shadow does not wait for the pounce.”

---

3. The People’s Path to True Economic Sovereignty

A. Reject the Double Game

• Follow the money: If bonds were golden, the elite would hoard them.

• Demand transparency: Where are the audits of bond spending?

B. Safer Alternatives for Citizens

1. Land & Real Estate – Tangible, inflation-resistant.

2. Foreign Currency – Hedge against franc collapse.

3. Private Businesses – Build real wealth, not paper promises.

C. The Bigger Fight

This isn’t just about finance—it’s about:

• Breaking psychological control (“Invest, or you’re unpatriotic!”).

• Rejecting extractive economics (where citizens fund elite corruption).

• Reclaiming economic dignity.

“A people who control their wealth control their future.”

---

Conclusion: Wake Up and Take Back Power

The elite’s flight from T-Bonds is the most honest review of Rwanda’s financial system you’ll ever get. Their actions scream:

“These bonds are a bad deal—we won’t touch them, but you should!”

Rwandans must choose:

• Keep funding a rigged system, or

• Build real wealth beyond state control.

“The wise farmer keeps his seeds—he does not give them all to the king’s granary.”

The people of Rwanda deserve more than crumbs from their harvest.

Sub delegate

Joram Jojo